Orionids

The only genuinely two-hemisphere shower in the top half of the table, fed by Halley's Comet.

Stream data

Zenithal hourly rate
20
Population index r
2.5 (balanced)
Speed
66.1 km/s (fast)
Radiant (J2000)
6h 20m, +15.7°
Radiant drift
+0.7914, +0.0304 °/° solar longitude
Solar longitude of maximum
208°
Activity window
2 October – 7 November (37 days)
Parent body
Comet 1P/Halley

Source solution: IAU MDC established V.2 (AdNo=009, sub.date 2023-10-01, |LoS-peak|=1.50deg — most recent complete solution within 10deg of peak) + Stellarium MeteorShowers.json v2; parent_body from IAU MDC Origin (AdNo=009)

The Orionid radiant sits at declination +15.7°, close enough to the celestial equator that the shower works from both hemispheres — around 66° maximum altitude from 40°N and around 40° from Sydney. Nothing else on this site with a comparable rate is that even-handed. The Perseids exclude the southern hemisphere outright and the eta-Aquariids marginalise the northern one; the Orionids do neither.

A ZHR of 20 puts them mid-table, and at 66.1 km/s they are among the fastest meteors here — bright, short and prone to leaving persistent trains. The population index of 2.5 is mid-range, so a dark site helps materially without being essential.

The activity window runs 2 October to 7 November, 37 days, and the profile around the peak is comparatively broad. That has a practical consequence most shower pages miss: if the peak falls under a bright Moon, watching several nights off-peak once the Moon rises later can genuinely beat watching the peak itself. The Orionids are one of the few showers where that trade is worth making.

Where on Earth it works

The radiant passes overhead at 15.7°N and never rises at all south of 74.3°S. A radiant's highest possible altitude is 90° minus the difference between your latitude and its declination, and the rate you see scales with the sine of that altitude — so this table is the ceiling, before any Moon, cloud or light pollution.

Latitude Highest the radiant gets Share of the zenithal rate
60°N — Oslo, Anchorage 46° 72%
51.5°N — London, Calgary 54° 81%
40°N — Madrid, New York, Beijing 66° 91%
22.3°N — Hong Kong, Mexico City 83° 99%
0° — the equator 74° 96%
23.5°S — São Paulo, Brisbane 51° 77%
33.9°S — Sydney, Cape Town 40° 65%
41°S — Wellington 33° 55%

Below the horizon all night south of 74.3°S: for observers there the modelled rate is zero rather than small, and the verdict on this site reports "not visible from your latitude" instead of a number.

The next five peaks

Peak instants are solved from the tabulated solar longitude of maximum (208°, referenced to the J2000 equinox). Moon illumination is the fraction of the lunar disc lit at that instant — the one factor you can plan around years ahead.

Year Peak (UTC) Weekday Moon lit What that means
2026 Wednesday 79% waxing gibbous
2027 Friday 58% last quarter
2028 Saturday 13% waxing crescent
2029 Sunday 99% full Moon
2030 Monday 29% waning crescent

In 2026 that means a bright sky — a near-full Moon will leave only the brightest meteors visible. Full year pages: 2026 · 2027.

Orionids: the questions that change the decision

Are the Orionids worth a night out, or are they a consolation prize between the Perseids and the Geminids?

A ZHR of 20 puts them mid-table, but two things work in their favour. The radiant is at declination +15.7°, close enough to the celestial equator that both hemispheres get a usable view — 61° from 45°N and 40° from Sydney. And at 66.1 km/s they are among the fastest showers here, which produces long trails and a high share of persistent trains. It is a genuinely two-hemisphere shower, which the Perseids and Geminids are not.

Orionids or Leonids — which November-adjacent shower deserves the effort?

The Orionids carry ZHR 20 against the Leonids' 12.5, and their radiant at +15.7° declination is friendlier to southern observers than the Leonid radiant at +21.8°. Both are fast showers from famous parent comets. On the tabulated numbers the Orionids are the better bet in an ordinary year; the Leonids only overtake them in a storm year, which this site does not attempt to forecast.

The activity period runs over a month — is the peak night actually worth targeting?

The window is 2 October – 7 November, 37 days. A broad window means the profile around the peak is comparatively flat, so a night either side of the peak is a reasonable substitute if cloud rules out the peak itself. It also means the Moon moves noticeably across the window: a peak under a bright Moon can still be worth watching several nights later once the Moon rises later in the night.

Which Orionid years are free of moonlight at the peak?

Of 2026 to 2030: 2028 are dark, 2026 and 2029 are badly moonlit. Given the broad activity window, a moonlit Orionid peak is one of the few cases where deliberately watching several nights off-peak is the better decision.

Do I need to be away from city lights to see Orionids?

The population index is 2.5, mid-range for this set, so each magnitude of sky brightness divides your count by 2.5. A typical suburban sky costs around two magnitudes against the reference, which is a factor of roughly 6.3. With a ZHR of 20 to start from, that is the difference between a shower and a curiosity. An hour's drive is usually the single most effective thing you can change.

Which Orionids years between 2026 and 2030 are actually worth planning around?

Judged only on how much of the Moon is lit at the peak instant: 2026 — 21 October 2026 (Moon 79% lit); 2027 — 22 October 2027 (Moon 58% lit); 2028 — 21 October 2028 (Moon 13% lit); 2029 — 21 October 2029 (Moon 99% lit); 2030 — 21 October 2030 (Moon 29% lit). The dark-Moon years are 2028; the washed-out ones are 2026 and 2029. Moon illumination is the only one of the four factors that is knowable years ahead — cloud cover is not, and neither is whether you will be somewhere dark.

Why do I always see fewer Orionids than the 20 per hour that gets quoted?

Because 20 is the zenithal hourly rate: what one observer would count under a magnitude 6.5 sky with the radiant straight overhead. Two corrections pull it down before you ever look up. Rate scales with the sine of the radiant altitude, so a radiant 30° up delivers half of what it delivers at the zenith. And the population index for this shower is r = 2.5, which means each magnitude of sky brightness you lose costs you a factor of 2.5 in the count. A suburban sky two magnitudes shallower than the reference therefore divides the rate by about 6.3. Real counts are typically 30–50% under the modelled figure even after those corrections.

Viewing from a city

The rate below each name is what the Orionids reach from that city on the peak night — the published zenithal rate corrected for how high the radiant actually climbs there, how long the sky stays astronomically dark and how much of that window the Moon takes. Each page carries the full hour-by-hour working for its own coordinates.

Any other city: browse all 300.

Get told before the next peak

One email seven days before a peak so you can keep the night free, and one on the evening itself with the verdict for your location. If your sky is going to be hopeless that night, the second email tells you the next good night instead of pretending otherwise.

You will get a confirmation email first — nothing is sent until you click the link in it. Every email carries a one-click unsubscribe. We store your address, the rounded coordinates and your time zone, and nothing else. See the privacy notice.

Ask whether tonight is worth it where you are →