eta-Aquariids

The southern hemisphere's answer to the Perseids: fast, rich and badly placed for anyone in Europe or Canada.

Stream data

Zenithal hourly rate
50
Population index r
2.4 (balanced)
Speed
66.3 km/s (fast)
Radiant (J2000)
22h 35m, −0.5°
Radiant drift
+0.7609, +0.3652 °/° solar longitude
Solar longitude of maximum
45.5°
Activity window
19 April – 27 May (39 days)
Parent body
Comet 1P/Halley

Source solution: IAU MDC established V.2 (AdNo=011, sub.date 2023-10-01, |LoS-peak|=0.20deg — most recent complete solution within 10deg of peak) + Stellarium MeteorShowers.json v2; parent_body from Stellarium parentObj

The eta-Aquariid radiant lies at declination −0.5°, effectively on the celestial equator. That single number explains everything about the shower's reputation. On the equator it passes overhead; from 30°S it still climbs to about 60°; from 51.5°N it can only reach 38° at absolute best and in practice sits far lower during the hours it is up. With a ZHR of 50 the southern view is one of the year's better nights and the northern view is a thin one.

At 66.3 km/s these are among the fastest meteors on the site, second only to the Leonids. Fast meteors are brief and bright and a high proportion leave persistent trains — the glowing streak that hangs in the air for a second or two after the meteor has gone. The population index of 2.4 is mid-range, so the shower does lose meaningfully to moonlight, but not catastrophically.

The parent is Comet 1P/Halley, which also feeds the Orionids in October. Two showers from one comet, six months apart, hitting different hemispheres: it is the clearest illustration on the site of why a stream's geometry matters more than its pedigree.

Where on Earth it works

The radiant passes overhead at 0.5°S and never rises at all north of 89.5°N. A radiant's highest possible altitude is 90° minus the difference between your latitude and its declination, and the rate you see scales with the sine of that altitude — so this table is the ceiling, before any Moon, cloud or light pollution.

Latitude Highest the radiant gets Share of the zenithal rate
60°N — Oslo, Anchorage 30° 49%
51.5°N — London, Calgary 38° 62%
40°N — Madrid, New York, Beijing 50° 76%
22.3°N — Hong Kong, Mexico City 67° 92%
0° — the equator 90° 100%
23.5°S — São Paulo, Brisbane 67° 92%
33.9°S — Sydney, Cape Town 57° 83%
41°S — Wellington 49° 76%

Below the horizon all night north of 89.5°N: for observers there the modelled rate is zero rather than small, and the verdict on this site reports "not visible from your latitude" instead of a number.

The next five peaks

Peak instants are solved from the tabulated solar longitude of maximum (45.5°, referenced to the J2000 equinox). Moon illumination is the fraction of the lunar disc lit at that instant — the one factor you can plan around years ahead.

Year Peak (UTC) Weekday Moon lit What that means
2026 Wednesday 81% waning gibbous
2027 Thursday 0% new Moon
2028 Friday 89% waxing gibbous
2029 Sunday 43% last quarter
2030 Monday 13% waxing crescent

In 2026 that means a bright sky — a near-full Moon will leave only the brightest meteors visible. Full year pages: 2026 · 2027.

eta-Aquariids: the questions that change the decision

Are the eta-Aquariids worth it from the northern hemisphere, or is this a southern shower?

The radiant is at declination −0.5°, essentially on the celestial equator, so it rises for everyone — but only just clears the horizon in the pre-dawn hours from mid-northern latitudes. From 45°N it can reach 45°; from 20°S it reaches 70°. With a ZHR of 50 the southern view is one of the best of the year and the northern view is a thin one. This is the clearest hemisphere split among the twelve showers here.

eta-Aquariids or Perseids — which gives the better night from the southern hemisphere?

The eta-Aquariids, by default. The Perseid radiant is at declination +57.9°, so it never rises at all south of 32.1°S — from Sydney or Cape Town the Perseids are not a shower, they are a rumour. The eta-Aquariid radiant is on the equator and its ZHR of 50 is half the Perseid figure, but half of something beats all of nothing.

Which eta-Aquariid years are free of moonlight?

Between 2026 and 2030 the dark-Moon peaks fall in 2027 and 2030, and 2026 and 2028 are compromised by a Moon at least three-quarters lit. Moonlight costs more here than the calendar alone suggests. The radiant sits at −0.5° declination, so from the northern mid-latitudes it only clears the horizon in the last couple of hours before dawn — a Moon inside that short window takes most of what there is. With a population index of 2.4, every magnitude of extra sky brightness divides the count by 2.4, so a tabulated ZHR of 50 does not survive much of it.

The activity period is over a month long — does that mean any night will do?

The window runs 19 April – 27 May, 39 days, which is unusually generous. It does not mean the rate is flat across it: the tabulated ZHR of 50 applies at the peak solar longitude, and activity falls away on either side. What the long window does buy you is resilience against cloud. If the peak night is overcast, a night two or three days either side is still worth going out for, which is not true of the Quadrantids or the Ursids.

Do fast meteors like these need a darker sky?

At 66.3 km/s the eta-Aquariids are among the fastest of the twelve — fast meteors leave longer, thinner trails and a higher share leave persistent trains. The population index is 2.4, mid-range for this set, so the shower does lose more to a bright sky than the Quadrantids do: each magnitude of sky glow divides the count by 2.4.

Which eta-Aquariids years between 2026 and 2030 are actually worth planning around?

Judged only on how much of the Moon is lit at the peak instant: 2026 — 6 May 2026 (Moon 81% lit); 2027 — 6 May 2027 (Moon 0% lit); 2028 — 5 May 2028 (Moon 89% lit); 2029 — 6 May 2029 (Moon 43% lit); 2030 — 6 May 2030 (Moon 13% lit). The dark-Moon years are 2027 and 2030; the washed-out ones are 2026 and 2028. Moon illumination is the only one of the four factors that is knowable years ahead — cloud cover is not, and neither is whether you will be somewhere dark.

Why do I always see fewer eta-Aquariids than the 50 per hour that gets quoted?

Because 50 is the zenithal hourly rate: what one observer would count under a magnitude 6.5 sky with the radiant straight overhead. Two corrections pull it down before you ever look up. Rate scales with the sine of the radiant altitude, so a radiant 30° up delivers half of what it delivers at the zenith. And the population index for this shower is r = 2.4, which means each magnitude of sky brightness you lose costs you a factor of 2.4 in the count. A suburban sky two magnitudes shallower than the reference therefore divides the rate by about 5.8. Real counts are typically 30–50% under the modelled figure even after those corrections.

Viewing from a city

The rate below each name is what the eta-Aquariids reach from that city on the peak night — the published zenithal rate corrected for how high the radiant actually climbs there, how long the sky stays astronomically dark and how much of that window the Moon takes. Each page carries the full hour-by-hour working for its own coordinates.

Any other city: browse all 300.

Get told before the next peak

One email seven days before a peak so you can keep the night free, and one on the evening itself with the verdict for your location. If your sky is going to be hopeless that night, the second email tells you the next good night instead of pretending otherwise.

You will get a confirmation email first — nothing is sent until you click the link in it. Every email carries a one-click unsubscribe. We store your address, the rounded coordinates and your time zone, and nothing else. See the privacy notice.

Ask whether tonight is worth it where you are →