Geminids
Active 4 December – 20 December
- ZHR 150
- Radiant dec +32.3°
- Speed 33.8 km/s
- Best from Northern hemisphere
The fastest meteors on the site, at a rate that only justifies the effort when the Moon cooperates.
Source solution: IAU MDC established V.2 (AdNo=014, sub.date 2023-10-01, |LoS-peak|=1.03deg — most recent complete solution within 10deg of peak) + Stellarium MeteorShowers.json v2; parent_body from Stellarium parentObj
At 70.3 km/s the Leonids are the fastest stream here — Earth meets this one nearly head-on, which is why the meteors are so brief and so bright and why persistent trains are common. The tabulated ZHR of 12.5 is modest, and after the radiant-altitude correction a realistic count is small. In a dark-Moon year with a clear sky it is an hour well spent; in a moonlit year it is not.
The radiant at declination +21.8° works from both hemispheres, reaching about 72° from 40°N and about 34° from Sydney. The activity window is 6 to 30 November, 25 days, which gives a little tolerance for cloud but not much.
The Leonids are famous for the 1833, 1866, 1966 and 1999–2002 storms, produced when Earth crossed a dense trail released by Comet 55P/Tempel-Tuttle on a specific perihelion passage. Predicting those requires integrating the comet's ejecta trails forward in time, which is outside this engine's scope and is listed as an exclusion on the methodology page. The number here is the ordinary-year baseline.
The radiant passes overhead at 21.8°N and never rises at all south of 68.2°S. A radiant's highest possible altitude is 90° minus the difference between your latitude and its declination, and the rate you see scales with the sine of that altitude — so this table is the ceiling, before any Moon, cloud or light pollution.
| Latitude | Highest the radiant gets | Share of the zenithal rate |
|---|---|---|
| 60°N — Oslo, Anchorage | 52° | 79% |
| 51.5°N — London, Calgary | 60° | 87% |
| 40°N — Madrid, New York, Beijing | 72° | 95% |
| 22.3°N — Hong Kong, Mexico City | 90° | 100% |
| 0° — the equator | 68° | 93% |
| 23.5°S — São Paulo, Brisbane | 45° | 70% |
| 33.9°S — Sydney, Cape Town | 34° | 56% |
| 41°S — Wellington | 27° | 46% |
Below the horizon all night south of 68.2°S: for observers there the modelled rate is zero rather than small, and the verdict on this site reports "not visible from your latitude" instead of a number.
Peak instants are solved from the tabulated solar longitude of maximum (235.27°, referenced to the J2000 equinox). Moon illumination is the fraction of the lunar disc lit at that instant — the one factor you can plan around years ahead.
| Year | Peak (UTC) | Weekday | Moon lit | What that means |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Tuesday | 55% | first quarter | |
| 2027 | Thursday | 80% | waning gibbous | |
| 2028 | Friday | 1% | new Moon | |
| 2029 | Saturday | 90% | waxing gibbous | |
| 2030 | Monday | 53% | last quarter |
In 2026 that means a compromised sky — a gibbous Moon will wash out the fainter half of the shower. Full year pages: 2026 · 2027.
The tabulated ZHR is 12.5, which is a modest shower — around one meteor every five minutes at the theoretical best, and considerably less after the radiant-altitude correction. What the Leonids offer instead is speed: 70.3 km/s is the fastest of the twelve showers here, which produces bright, sharp meteors and a high proportion of persistent trains. In a dark-Moon year with a clear sky it is worth an hour. In a moonlit year it is not.
No forecast is made here. Leonid storms happen when Earth passes through a dense, recently released dust trail, which requires modelling the parent comet's ejecta trails forward in time. Historically they cluster near the perihelion passages of comet 55P/Tempel-Tuttle, which returns roughly every 33 years: 1833, 1866 and 1966 produced true storms, and the 1999 to 2002 returns produced outbursts with rates in the thousands per hour. The comet last passed perihelion in 1998 and is next due around 2031. The methodology page lists outbursts as an explicit limitation of this engine. The numbers on this site are the regular-activity baseline — a tabulated ZHR of 12.5 — and a specialist trail forecast, when one exists for a given year, is the better source.
The Geminids, comfortably, in an ordinary year: ZHR 150 against 12.5, and a radiant at declination +32.3° that is better placed for mid-northern observers than the Leonid radiant at +21.8°. The Leonids only become the better choice in a predicted outburst year, or when the Geminid peak falls under a bright Moon and the Leonid peak does not.
Between 2026 and 2030: 2028 are dark, 2027 and 2029 are washed out. With a base ZHR of 12.5 there is very little margin — a moonlit Leonid peak is usually not worth the lost sleep.
Not because of the speed itself, but the population index matters and for the Leonids it is 2.5. Each magnitude of sky brightness divides your count by that factor, so a two-magnitude suburban penalty costs roughly 6.3× the rate. The compensation is that fast meteors are more likely to be bright, so the ones that survive a compromised sky are the spectacular ones.
Judged only on how much of the Moon is lit at the peak instant: 2026 — 17 November 2026 (Moon 55% lit); 2027 — 18 November 2027 (Moon 80% lit); 2028 — 17 November 2028 (Moon 1% lit); 2029 — 17 November 2029 (Moon 90% lit); 2030 — 18 November 2030 (Moon 53% lit). The dark-Moon years are 2028; the washed-out ones are 2027 and 2029. Moon illumination is the only one of the four factors that is knowable years ahead — cloud cover is not, and neither is whether you will be somewhere dark.
Because 12.5 is the zenithal hourly rate: what one observer would count under a magnitude 6.5 sky with the radiant straight overhead. Two corrections pull it down before you ever look up. Rate scales with the sine of the radiant altitude, so a radiant 30° up delivers half of what it delivers at the zenith. And the population index for this shower is r = 2.5, which means each magnitude of sky brightness you lose costs you a factor of 2.5 in the count. A suburban sky two magnitudes shallower than the reference therefore divides the rate by about 6.3. Real counts are typically 30–50% under the modelled figure even after those corrections.
One email seven days before a peak so you can keep the night free, and one on the evening itself with the verdict for your location. If your sky is going to be hopeless that night, the second email tells you the next good night instead of pretending otherwise.