Quadrantids

The strongest shower of the year by tabulated rate, hidden inside the worst weather and the shortest usable window.

Stream data

Zenithal hourly rate
110
Population index r
2.1 (bright rich)
Speed
40.4 km/s (medium)
Radiant (J2000)
15h 19m, +49.8°
Radiant drift
+0.8725, -0.3855 °/° solar longitude
Solar longitude of maximum
283.15°
Activity window
28 December – 12 January (16 days)
Parent body
Minor planet 2003 EH1 and Comet C/1490 Y1

Source solution: IAU MDC established V.2 (AdNo=008, sub.date 2023-10-01, |LoS-peak|=0.05deg — most recent complete solution within 10deg of peak) + Stellarium MeteorShowers.json v2; parent_body from Stellarium parentObj

A ZHR of 110 puts the Quadrantids ahead of the Perseids on paper, and a population index of 2.1 — the joint-lowest of the twelve, shared with the April Lyrids — means the stream is comparatively rich in bright meteors. Neither fact helps if you are looking at the wrong part of the wrong night. The activity window is 16 days against 39 for the Perseids, and the peak solar longitude is quoted as 283.15°, a figure precise to roughly a quarter of an hour of Earth's orbital motion. This is the one shower on the site where the difference between the right night and the night before is the difference between a shower and nothing.

The radiant sits at declination +49.8°, in the disused constellation Quadrans Muralis between Boötes and Draco, which makes it circumpolar from most of the populated northern hemisphere and useless from the southern one. From 50°N it can reach 90° minus the 0.2° difference between latitude and declination — effectively straight overhead. From Sydney at 33.9°S it never gets more than a few degrees up, and the sine correction alone removes almost all of the rate.

The parent bodies are unusual: minor planet 2003 EH1 and Comet C/1490 Y1, an asteroid-comet pair rather than the single active comet behind most streams. That is a curiosity rather than a planning consideration; what it means practically is that the stream is dense and narrow, which is exactly what the short window and high rate describe.

Where on Earth it works

The radiant passes overhead at 49.8°N and never rises at all south of 40.2°S. A radiant's highest possible altitude is 90° minus the difference between your latitude and its declination, and the rate you see scales with the sine of that altitude — so this table is the ceiling, before any Moon, cloud or light pollution.

Latitude Highest the radiant gets Share of the zenithal rate
60°N — Oslo, Anchorage 80° 98%
51.5°N — London, Calgary 88° 100%
40°N — Madrid, New York, Beijing 80° 99%
22.3°N — Hong Kong, Mexico City 62° 89%
0° — the equator 40° 65%
23.5°S — São Paulo, Brisbane 17° 29%
33.9°S — Sydney, Cape Town 11%
41°S — Wellington Never rises 0%

Below the horizon all night south of 40.2°S: for observers there the modelled rate is zero rather than small, and the verdict on this site reports "not visible from your latitude" instead of a number.

The next five peaks

Peak instants are solved from the tabulated solar longitude of maximum (283.15°, referenced to the J2000 equinox). Moon illumination is the fraction of the lunar disc lit at that instant — the one factor you can plan around years ahead.

Year Peak (UTC) Weekday Moon lit What that means
2026 Saturday 100% full Moon
2027 Monday 12% waning crescent
2028 Tuesday 44% first quarter
2029 Wednesday 89% waning gibbous
2030 Thursday 0% new Moon

In 2026 that means a bright sky — a near-full Moon will leave only the brightest meteors visible. Full year pages: 2026 · 2027.

Quadrantids: the questions that change the decision

Are the Quadrantids worth setting an alarm for, or should I just wait for the Perseids?

On paper the Quadrantids win: ZHR 110 against the Perseids' 100, and a population index of 2.1 against 2.2, which means a slightly higher share of bright meteors. The catch is the window. Quadrantid activity spans 16 days against 39 for the Perseids, and the peak solar longitude is quoted to two decimal places (283.15°) — about a quarter of an hour of Earth's orbital motion. Being half a day off the peak costs you far more here than it does in August. Treat the Quadrantids as a single-night decision and the Perseids as a week-long one.

Can I see the Quadrantids from Australia or southern Africa?

The radiant sits at declination +49.8°, so south of 40.2°S the radiant never rises at all. From Sydney at 33.9°S the radiant tops out at 6° above the horizon, which multiplies the rate by the sine of that angle — effectively nothing. From Johannesburg at 26.2°S it reaches 14°. This is a northern-hemisphere shower in practice, not just on paper.

Does driving out of the city help more for the Quadrantids than for other showers?

Less than for most. r = 2.1 is the joint-lowest population index of the twelve showers on this site — shared with the April Lyrids — meaning Quadrantid meteors skew bright, so the shower survives a compromised sky better than a faint-rich one like the Southern delta-Aquariids at r = 3.2. A magnitude of extra sky darkness multiplies your Quadrantid count by 2.1 but multiplies a delta-Aquariid count by 3.2. If you only have one dark-sky trip in you, spend it on the faint-rich shower.

Is a January shower a realistic target if I live somewhere cloudy?

That is exactly the question this site answers rather than the calendar. The Quadrantids peak in the first days of January, when cloud climatology is at its worst across most of the northern mid-latitudes, and the sharp peak means there is no second chance a night later. Check the hourly cloud forecast for your own coordinates on the night; if it is above 70% the verdict here will say so and point you at the next shower with a usable Moon instead.

Which Quadrantids years between 2026 and 2030 are actually worth planning around?

Judged only on how much of the Moon is lit at the peak instant: 2026 — 3 January 2026 (Moon 100% lit); 2027 — 4 January 2027 (Moon 12% lit); 2028 — 4 January 2028 (Moon 44% lit); 2029 — 3 January 2029 (Moon 89% lit); 2030 — 3 January 2030 (Moon 0% lit). The dark-Moon years are 2027 and 2030; the washed-out ones are 2026 and 2029. Moon illumination is the only one of the four factors that is knowable years ahead — cloud cover is not, and neither is whether you will be somewhere dark.

Why do I always see fewer Quadrantids than the 110 per hour that gets quoted?

Because 110 is the zenithal hourly rate: what one observer would count under a magnitude 6.5 sky with the radiant straight overhead. Two corrections pull it down before you ever look up. Rate scales with the sine of the radiant altitude, so a radiant 30° up delivers half of what it delivers at the zenith. And the population index for this shower is r = 2.1, which means each magnitude of sky brightness you lose costs you a factor of 2.1 in the count. A suburban sky two magnitudes shallower than the reference therefore divides the rate by about 4.4. Real counts are typically 30–50% under the modelled figure even after those corrections.

Viewing from a city

The rate below each name is what the Quadrantids reach from that city on the peak night — the published zenithal rate corrected for how high the radiant actually climbs there, how long the sky stays astronomically dark and how much of that window the Moon takes. Each page carries the full hour-by-hour working for its own coordinates.

Any other city: browse all 300.

Get told before the next peak

One email seven days before a peak so you can keep the night free, and one on the evening itself with the verdict for your location. If your sky is going to be hopeless that night, the second email tells you the next good night instead of pretending otherwise.

You will get a confirmation email first — nothing is sent until you click the link in it. Every email carries a one-click unsubscribe. We store your address, the rounded coordinates and your time zone, and nothing else. See the privacy notice.

Ask whether tonight is worth it where you are →